Evolution or creation, or what?
In other words about truth, human capability, happiness, love, harmony and vegetarianism (i.e.only vegetarian food).
On the whole we have accepted the evolution theory, and it could be said, that it is an official belief on life creation and our existence. It is taught at schools, atheists take it for granted, but also many of the believers have accepted it. And as a certain evolutionist said – although it has never been proved and it cannot be proved – we have still accepted it. Of course there is no evidence and no fact that would support it. In the past it was believed that life arose from non-living matter, such as simple organic compounds (natural process called Abiogenesis). This theory received deadly blow in 1864 when Louis Pasteur proved that in sterile water, protected against any contamination, no life creation was possible, not even the simplest bacteria. At about the same time Charles Darwin published his book On the Origin of Species (1859). In this book transmutation of species is presented as an evolution element. And yet, in spite of the fact that there had never been a known case of evolution from one species into another, scientists approved of Darwin´s theory. His opinion that only the belief in Jesus Christ makes sense and that ideas are like children created by man and live their own lives proves, that he himself looked at his work with certain reservation. There are a countless number of questions which the evolutionists cannot answer. To name but few I would select the following ten: (1) Creation of Life. The evolutionists would say the basic organism and not only in the animal kingdom; but also (2) in the plant kingdom. Up until today that is not known and e.g. Darwin believed that God created life on Earth and only then evolution had begun (theory refused by today´s scientists);(3)How did the animal kingdom learn to multiply; (4) same goes for plant kingdom; (5) what caused the growth of animals and (6)plants; how were the animal(7) and plant (8) species created; how come that an egg and sperm cell agreed not to join with another one and a new species was created; (9) e.g. how was the eye created; (10)what are those Evolution Laws. Evolution Theory maintains that life was created by an accident or coincidence in time in which thunderbolts, eruptions and gurgling mud started off the simplest organisms and then, due to evolution, led to creation of life as it is known today. The above aspects simply proved something which today´s man has not been able to prove even with the help of computers although no doubt has been trying very hard. The human body itself is a complicated computer in which everything slots into each other – body processes such as in intestines and liver and body computer programmes such as self-repair, restoration, ageing, death, self-preservation instinct, love, pain, happiness, sleep and who knows what.
Human retina causes envy in all cybernetics scientists. Its 100 millions of retinal cones and nerve cells come with 10 billions of calculations per second. Similar to what is happening in the eye´s retina is happening in muscles, intestines-digestion of food, when the body computer accepts what it needs, what compounds or elements and that what it does not need gets shaped and brown coloured, extracts liquids and gives us a signal to go to a certain place where, providing we are healthy, it elegantly leaves our body (roe buck watches roe deer and takes one with the best droppings). At a concert, or when love making it does not run out of our body either it does when travelling in a tube, at work or in a pool…Wise evolution. So, there is no need to wear plastic underpants, nor it is necessary to tie our trouser legs and grumble at our shitty lives. Further, if I want to touch the piano keyboard, my arm is not a just robot lever in a car factory. My arm may play Liszt. Evolution reacts by movement, by change, however the eye and the lot – or the whole creature – are similar assembly, just like atom. For example, if we were to take “a mouse-trap, an alarm-clock, it does not matter whether with wheels or electronics, a computer, a car … in the end we shall need a base-plate, a spring and other components of appropriate value in order to assemble these products”. The evolution does not work like that. Neither in fossils nor at present there are no intermediate forms only the species. If I were to have children they might have wings already, because I used to enjoy jumping down from my bed and other heights and there are two lumps on my back already. How come that suddenly an egg / sperm cell gets fixed, and refuses to join another one and we have a new species? In the world of insects there are a million species and none of them crosses with each other, no chance. Differences within each species are not the signs of evolution, but variability with its limits which are unsurpassed. And which help us with recognition and make life variegated. In evolution, how can actually a tooth or bird´s feather be created? By the way, since I am interested in sleeping bag or winter anorak´s fillings there are laboratories all over the world that for many decades are trying to produce light, more compact and maximum thermal insulation fibre. Number one is Climashild. However, down feather is still a long way ahead. The best comes from common eider. As I mentioned at the beginning, these pitfalls and absurdity of evolution theory are more or less recognised by most evolutionists. In spite of that the evolution theory is believed in. It is believed in because there are only two alternatives why we are here – evolution or creation (or combination of these two). Should evolution be impossible then automatically it should be creation. However, the existence of God is regarded as even a greater wonder than evolution. So, according to up to date knowledge and our logical consideration would evolution be seen as the only possible way how to explain the creation of life and why we are here. And this is the only reason why evolution is believed in and not because of (only) Darwin´s book. And those various bits and pieces of found bones, which are to prove something, are shaped according to this opinion and are the only evidence. It is possible that it would be believed in even if I were to produce even more absurd evidence against evolution. All that I have written so far can therefore be regarded as beating about the bush, introduction or as a foil to fill in the space. I could have written a fairy-tail about Little Red Riding Hood and then for example say that in comparison with evolution theory this is genuine truth – since what I regard as revealing and fundamental can be expressed with few words and that is too little for publication:
At school we had learnt that the smallest particle of matter is atom and that it cannot be split. It consists of a positively charged nucleus around which orbit negatively charged electrons – in a case of the simplest element helium it is only one electron. It is like as if we were to place a football in the middle of football pitch and along the sidelines we would run a table tennis ball. It would run absolutely regularly, without any hitch, punctually, at the same distance from the football and indefinitely. And of course anywhere on Earth, Moon or even on the furthest planet. From the above it is clear that the atom just cannot be the smallest part of matter, that there must be some mechanism which provides the given service in a limited space, the same anywhere, here or in the Milky Way and some wire or power which maintains the electron at a certain distance from the nucleus. The power of the atom is utilised in atom bombs or power-stations. We cannot comprehend this perpetual motion let alone produce it. It is beyond the boundaries of our comprehension.
THE CREATION OF LIFE AND WHY WE ARE CAN BE INCLUDED IN THIS CATEGORY WHICH IS BEYON OUR COMPREHENSION.
Invalidation of the Evolution theory is part of my defence of vegetarianism, whereby according to evolutionists we were to be adapted to animal diet. Human´s constitution does not reflect that at all. The man cannot hunt an animal without tools and according to how the digestive organism works it is evident that it had been made for pure vegetarian diet, opinion subscribed to authorities such as Cuvier or Linne, which in hindsight invalidates Evolution theory. Cholesterol is not included in vegetarian diet. However the human being can make it himself and does not have to take it in meat and on the contrary if taken in diet it causes some of the most serious health problems. Similarly, the human body can produce its own vitamin A, which is only in animal diet hence there is no need to consume meat. Same applies for vitamin B12. On the other hand it cannot produce and store vitamin C, which can only be found in vegetarian diet thus it must be consumed regularly. Human being that outgrows its infancy loses the ability to digest milk properly (?!!)-this goes entirely against the evolution theory. It is therefore normal not to eat meat, not to mention milk. Provision and consumption of animal diet is an element of disharmony, violation, rebellion and barbarism. It is not worthy of the human spirit as they used to say in the ancient world. Animals were created to keep company with humans on this planet or in this universe, therefore they are his friends with same feelings, sometimes even more intelligent and with greater feelings.
Our opportunities do not extend beyond the boundaries of the solar system of which life can be found only on our planet. So there is no chance to contact other civilisations, let alone move somewhere else. However, should there be such an opportunity would man like to devastate the whole universe? If we are so ingeniously programmed that our biggest joy is the conception of a child, desire to have an offspring and to look after it, harming organism causes pain, hunger urges us to supply organism with ingredients in the shape of foodstuff and this forces us to be active, we are afraid of death which urges us to preserve life. Then a man can hardly be fulfilled, have a feeling of happiness or gain happiness providing he does not live in harmony with his mission and the life cycle – leaves decompose before the spring comes and enrich the soil… as they are not from galvanized sheet metal, glass or plastic, or at least bits of wood piled during the passing years on top of each other for a couple of metres. They do not contaminate the soil, water table or air. Woodland has a pleasant smell and healing power the whole year round… so this is how the nature works, as a harmonious organism. Man´s role in every day violation, depreciation and destruction of our planet by seven billions of people can be compared to bacteria or a tumour that lives at the expense of organism until it destroys it and dies with it. The vegetarians maintain that the world is full of confrontation and vegetarianism could be inspiring if not directly indispensable. Closest creature to a human is the gorilla. It is a pure vegetarian, many times stronger than a man. Exceptionally peace-loving, nevertheless man, to his image, created a bloodthirsty creature out of it. Next closest mammal is the chimpanzee. The world bestseller by Jane Goodall, who was observing them for ten years, you could say that she was living with them, describes their idyllic life and to her surprise she finds out that they go through periods when they devour meat. Until then they were regarded as vegetarians. This group, which had happened after the book was published, killed off itself. Even this could be inspiring. Man in his fantasy imagines that in the future when everything will be controlled by robots some faulty programme will cause destruction. Unfortunately, he whom the programme failed is a man himself since he became a carnivore.
Comments